Sorry it's taken me so long to respond to this email; I've been on my honeymoon in remote places.What is required to move forward on this? Do we *need* to move forward on this?
I had a few wording fixes suggested in off-list email by various -legal members. In addition, there were some very good suggestions for making the licenses acceptable for Debian.
I've been contacted by people at Creative Commons who'd like to have a telephone conference to go over the draft. I think they're open to our suggestions, if we can stay focused on particulars. Right now, I think this is going to have to happen in late Jan. I'm running behind on a lot of things. I'm not even sure how we'd set up a debian-legal telecon.
I *will* try to send out a "final" version of the summary this wknd.
~ESP
|
-- Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
