debian-legal  

Messages by Date

• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Walter Landry
• 2005/01/14 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Josh Triplett
• 2005/01/14 Re: Illustrating JVM bindings Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/14 Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/14 Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal MJ Ray
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Dalibor Topic
• 2005/01/14 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/14 Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Gervase Markham
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Raul Miller
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Steve McIntyre
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Måns Rullgård
• 2005/01/14 Re: Illustrating JVM bindings Dalibor Topic
• 2005/01/14 Re: Illustrating JVM bindings Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael Poole
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/14 Re: Illustrating JVM bindings Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/14 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Florian Weimer
• 2005/01/14 License issues (Was: [bug #288429] asterisk's music files are definately non-free) Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Ken Arromdee
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Joel Aelwyn
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael Poole
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Dalibor Topic
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2005/01/14 Re: Illustrating JVM bindings Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2005/01/14 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Matthew Garrett
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Dalibor Topic
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Dalibor Topic
• 2005/01/14 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Måns Rullgård
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael Poole
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Raul Miller
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/14 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Matthew Garrett
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Raul Miller
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Dalibor Topic
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Dalibor Topic
• 2005/01/14 Re: Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Dalibor Topic
• 2005/01/14 Re: Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License Henning Makholm
• 2005/01/14 Re: Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/14 Re: Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/14 Re: Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License Brett Parker
• 2005/01/14 Re: Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License Michael Poole
• 2005/01/14 Re: Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/14 Re: Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/14 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/14 Re: Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License Brett Parker
• 2005/01/14 This is old FUD (Was: Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe) Dalibor Topic
• 2005/01/14 Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License Juhapekka Tolvanen
• 2005/01/14 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Dalibor Topic
• 2005/01/14 Re: OT: GPL section 4 termination clause Batist Paklons
• 2005/01/14 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Josh Triplett
• 2005/01/13 Re: prozilla: Nonfree Steve Langasek
• 2005/01/13 Re: prozilla: Nonfree Brian Nelson
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/13 Re: Illustrating JVM bindings Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/13 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Joel Aelwyn
• 2005/01/13 OT: GPL section 4 termination clause Lewis Jardine
• 2005/01/13 Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/13 Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/13 Re: how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file Henning Makholm
• 2005/01/13 Re: how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file Henning Makholm
• 2005/01/13 JVM = interpreter + VM bindings Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/13 Re: Illustrating JVM bindings Raul Miller
• 2005/01/13 Re: how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file Joey Hess
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2005/01/13 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Matthew Garrett
• 2005/01/13 Illustrating JVM bindings Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Raul Miller
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Måns Rullgård
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/13 Re: how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file Don Armstrong
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/13 Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal Gervase Markham
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/13 Re: how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file Don Armstrong
• 2005/01/13 Re: how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file Jochen Voss
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2005/01/13 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Henning Makholm
• 2005/01/13 GNU Classpath based execution environments (Was: Eclipse 3.0) Mark Wielaard
• 2005/01/13 Re: how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file Henning Makholm
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Raul Miller
• 2005/01/13 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/13 Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Henning Makholm
• 2005/01/13 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Josh Triplett
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Måns Rullgård
• 2005/01/13 Re: LCC and blobs Josh Triplett
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Måns Rullgård
• 2005/01/13 how to mention GPL in the debian/copyright file Jochen Voss
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Måns Rullgård
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2005/01/13 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Raul Miller
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/13 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Henning Makholm
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/13 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Henning Makholm
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Måns Rullgård
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Måns Rullgård
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Raul Miller
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael Poole
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Måns Rullgård
• 2005/01/13 Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael Poole
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Måns Rullgård
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Måns Rullgård
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael Poole
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/13 Re: Does GPL allow that? (not theorhetical) Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Måns Rullgård
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Måns Rullgård
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Måns Rullgård
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael Poole
• 2005/01/13 Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/13 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/13 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Glenn Maynard
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Raul Miller
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Måns Rullgård
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Dalibor Topic
• 2005/01/13 Re: prozilla: Nonfree Brian Nelson
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/13 Re: prozilla: Nonfree Henning Makholm
• 2005/01/13 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Henning Makholm
• 2005/01/13 Re: prozilla: Nonfree Justin Pryzby
• 2005/01/13 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Anthony DeRobertis
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Måns Rullgård
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Lewis Jardine
• 2005/01/13 Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Anthony DeRobertis
• 2005/01/13 Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Nathanael Nerode
• 2005/01/13 Re: Hypothetical situation to chew on Nathanael Nerode
• 2005/01/13 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Brian Thomas Sniffen
• 2005/01/13 Re: LCC and blobs Anthony DeRobertis
• 2005/01/13 Re: Draft summary of Creative Commons 2.0 licenses (version 2) Nathanael Nerode
• 2005/01/13 Re: Questions about legal theory behind (L)GPL Nathanael Nerode
• 2005/01/13 Re: prozilla: Nonfree Brian Nelson
• 2005/01/13 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? MJ Ray
• 2005/01/13 Re: prozilla: Nonfree MJ Ray
• 2005/01/13 Re: prozilla: Nonfree Matthew Palmer
• 2005/01/13 Re: prozilla: Nonfree Brian Nelson
• 2005/01/13 Re: prozilla: Nonfree Steve Langasek
• 2005/01/13 Re: prozilla: Nonfree David Schleef
• 2005/01/13 Re: prozilla: Nonfree Matthew Palmer
• 2005/01/13 OleMiss Email Account cnlawren DEACTIVATED Christopher Lawrence
• 2005/01/13 Re: prozilla: Nonfree Brian Nelson
• 2005/01/13 Re: prozilla: Nonfree Josh Triplett
• 2005/01/13 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Steve Langasek
• 2005/01/13 Re: prozilla: Nonfree Steve Langasek
• 2005/01/13 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Daniel Goldsmith
• 2005/01/13 Re: prozilla: Nonfree Brian Nelson
• 2005/01/13 Re: prozilla: Nonfree Brian Nelson
• 2005/01/13 Re: prozilla: Nonfree Josh Triplett
• 2005/01/12 Re: mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free? Steve Langasek
• 2005/01/12 Re: prozilla: Nonfree Matthew Palmer
• 2005/01/12 Re: prozilla: Nonfree Brian Nelson
• 2005/01/12 prozilla: Nonfree Justin Pryzby
• 2005/01/12 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/12 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Raul Miller
• 2005/01/12 Re: Bug#287090: kaquarium: copyright file does not mention apparently unlicensed image files Francesco Poli
• 2005/01/12 Re: Draft summary of Creative Commons 2.0 licenses (version 2) Francesco Poli
• 2005/01/12 [gnu.org #219101] Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL David Turner
• 2005/01/12 [gnu.org #219101] Re: Compatibility between CC licenses and the GPL [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
• 2005/01/12 Re: why is graphviz package non-free? Andrew Suffield
• 2005/01/12 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/12 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael K. Edwards
• 2005/01/12 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Raul Miller
• 2005/01/12 Does GPL allow that? (not theorhetical) Grzegorz B. Prokopski
• 2005/01/12 Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe Michael K. Edwards

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]