Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, 8.2b terminates rights when you sue a Participant alleging that > *anything* infringes any patent. > > As far as I know, *nobody* thinks that is OK. For instance, it could be over > Participant's use of your patent for extracting aluminum from ore.
It terminates a right we don't require in the first place. If the patent is actively enforced, we potentially have problems - if it isn't, why is it more of a problem than a license which didn't grant those permissions in the first place? > So the license is definitely not DFSG-free. This statement disagrees with several voiced opinions in the discussion on -project. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
