Raul - With regard to secondary publication, if you had in mind sublicensing by the licensee, I know of no case in which a right to sublicense was found without reference to a valid bilateral contract. (The Effects case comes closest, if you buy Kozinski's argument and read a form of implied license under copyright law into the appellate decision; but even so it doesn't reach sublicensing, and the court in Gardner v. Nike found that the right to sublicense isn't implied even in an exclusive license unless it's in the written agreement.)
And by the way, I'm sorry if my response to your first message seemed curt; I didn't spend enough time editing it for context. I'm getting a bit impatient with other persons (not on this list) who have repeatedly evaded requests for valid precedents. I had no business transferring that impatience to your argument, which I think was incorrect but not unreasonable. Cheers, - Michael