Hi! * Aschwin van der Woude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060712 10:39]:
> [..] But I do suggest not to create a team in a team. [..] > * Main organisor (one or two people) > One or two persons ensuring the whole process proceeds as > planned. They keep track of the total picture, identify potential > problems early on and manage the total team in general. As I understood Ganneffs mail (and in there an idea aba and I discussed with stockholm back in .mx), that's what he is proposing: A team in a team. Nota bene: It's the same you are proposing, just that he had four members as main organisors (and called them coordinatiors). What I think, is that we need someone who is doing the task described as "main organisor" above. I think it could work better, if it's a smaller group (but I had three people in mind). The important point is, that their job is *not* to make decissions, but to coordinate, keep track of timeline and deadlines. But I agree with holger here: We have time for that, and the future structure of the orga team is such an important point, that we must not be hasty about that. Yours sincerely, Alexander -- http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
