On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 12:06:19 GMT, Severin Gehwolf <sgehw...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Please review this extension to #22609 which now disallows `ALL-MODULE-PATH` 
>> without explicit `--module-path` option or a non-existent module path. In 
>> addition, this fixes a bug mentioned in #22609 when `ALL-MODULE-PATH` and 
>> `--limit-modules` are used in combination. It failed earlier and passes now 
>> due to alignment of `ModuleFinder`s. With this patch JEP 493 enabled builds 
>> and regular JDK builds behave the same in terms of `ALL-MODULE-PATH`.
>> 
>> When an explicit module path is being added, there is no difference. All 
>> modules on that path will be added as roots. Tests have been added for the 
>> various cases and existing tests updated to allow for them to run on JEP 493 
>> enabled builds. Thoughts?
>> 
>> Testing:
>> - [x] GHA, `test/jdk/tools/jlink` (all pass)
>> - [x] Added jlink test.
>
> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request incrementally with two 
> additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Handle non-existent module-path with ALL-MODULE-PATH
>  - Move test, more test fixes for JEP 493 enabled builds

> This comment is also part of #22609.

Thanks. I'll update #22609 and then update relevant parts here.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22494#issuecomment-2536286749

Reply via email to