core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8372155: RealeaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372155: RealeaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8372155: RealeaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372155: RealeaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8372155: RealeaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372155: RealeaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8372155: RealeaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8372155: RealeaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372155: RealeaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372155: RealeaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8372155: RealeaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly [v3] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8372155: RealeaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8372155: ReleaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly [v4] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8372155: ReleaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly [v4] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8372155: ReleaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8372155: ReleaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly [v4] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8372155: ReleaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8372155: ReleaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly [v4] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8372155: ReleaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly [v5] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8372155: ReleaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8372155: ReleaseInfoPlugin doesn't handle input file as UTF-8 properly Severin Gehwolf
• RFR: 8371440: jpackage should exit with an error if it finds multiple matching signing certificates Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8371440: jpackage should exit with an error if it finds multiple matching signing certificates Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8371440: jpackage should exit with an error if it finds multiple matching signing certificates Alexander Matveev
  • Integrated: 8371440: jpackage should exit with an error if it finds multiple matching signing certificates Alexey Semenyuk
• Withdrawn: 8368349: Add library notes discussing abs and IEEE 754 operations duke
• RFR: 8372118: Test tools/jpackage/macosx/DmgContentTest.java failed Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8372118: Test tools/jpackage/macosx/DmgContentTest.java failed Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8372118: Test tools/jpackage/macosx/DmgContentTest.java failed Alexey Semenyuk
  • Integrated: 8372118: Test tools/jpackage/macosx/DmgContentTest.java failed Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8372117: Correct the misleading comment in Character.UnicodeBlock Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8372117: Correct the misleading comment in Character.UnicodeBlock Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8372117: Correct the misleading comment in Character.UnicodeBlock Joe Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8372117: Correct the misleading comment in Character.UnicodeBlock Justin Lu
  • Integrated: 8372117: Correct the misleading comment in Character.UnicodeBlock Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8372117: Correct the misleading comment in Character.UnicodeBlock Naoto Sato
• Integrated: 8357728: Avoid caching synthesized names in synthesized parameters Chen Liang
• RFR: 8372146: Follow-up changes to the Lazy Constants JEP Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8372146: Follow-up changes to the Lazy Constants JEP Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8372146: Follow-up changes to the Lazy Constants JEP Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372146: Follow-up changes to the Lazy Constants JEP Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8372146: Follow-up changes to the Lazy Constants JEP Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8372146: Follow-up changes to the Lazy Constants JEP Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8372146: Follow-up changes to the Lazy Constants JEP Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8372146: Follow-up changes to the Lazy Constants JEP [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8372146: Follow-up changes to the Lazy Constants JEP [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8372146: Follow-up changes to the Lazy Constants JEP [v2] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8372146: Follow-up changes to the Lazy Constants JEP Per Minborg
• RFR: 8372119: Missing copyright header in MinMaxVector Galder Zamarreño
  • Re: RFR: 8372119: Missing copyright header in MinMaxVector Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8372119: Missing copyright header in MinMaxVector Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8372119: Missing copyright header in MinMaxVector Galder Zamarreño
  • Integrated: 8372119: Missing copyright header in MinMaxVector Galder Zamarreño
• Re: RFR: 8360046: Scalability issue when submitting virtual threads with almost empty tasks [v17] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8360046: Scalability issue when submitting virtual threads with almost empty tasks [v17] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8360046: Scalability issue when submitting virtual threads with almost empty tasks [v17] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8308776: [AArch64] Math.log is 10% slower than StrictMath.log on aarch64 Dhamoder Nalla
  • Re: RFR: 8308776: [AArch64] Math.log is 10% slower than StrictMath.log on aarch64 Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8308776: [AArch64] Math.log is 10% slower than StrictMath.log on aarch64 Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8308776: [AArch64] Math.log is 10% slower than StrictMath.log on aarch64 Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8308776: [AArch64] Math.log is 10% slower than StrictMath.log on aarch64 [v2] Dhamoder Nalla
  • Re: RFR: 8308776: [AArch64] Math.log is 10% slower than StrictMath.log on aarch64 [v2] Dhamoder Nalla
  • Re: RFR: 8308776: [AArch64] Math.log is 10% slower than StrictMath.log on aarch64 Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8308776: [AArch64] Math.log is 10% slower than StrictMath.log on aarch64 [v2] Dhamoder Nalla
  • Re: RFR: 8308776: [AArch64] Math.log is 10% slower than StrictMath.log on aarch64 Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8308776: [AArch64] Math.log is 10% slower than StrictMath.log on aarch64 Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8308776: [AArch64] Math.log is 10% slower than StrictMath.log on aarch64 [v2] Dhamoder Nalla
  • Re: RFR: 8308776: [AArch64] Math.log is 10% slower than StrictMath.log on aarch64 [v2] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8308776: [AArch64] Math.log is 10% slower than StrictMath.log on aarch64 [v3] Dhamoder Nalla
• ThreadLocalRandom.nextGaussian() uses locking Random.nextGaussian() implementation James Yuzawa
  • Re: ThreadLocalRandom.nextGaussian() uses locking Random.nextGaussian() implementation Alan Bateman
  • Re: ThreadLocalRandom.nextGaussian() uses locking Random.nextGaussian() implementation Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8372047: ClassTransform.transformingMethodBodies andThen composes incorrectly Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372047: ClassTransform.transformingMethodBodies andThen composes incorrectly [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372047: ClassTransform.transformingMethodBodies andThen composes incorrectly [v2] Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8372047: ClassTransform.transformingMethodBodies andThen composes incorrectly [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372047: ClassTransform.transformingMethodBodies andThen composes incorrectly [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372047: ClassTransform.transformingMethodBodies andThen composes incorrectly [v3] Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8372047: ClassTransform.transformingMethodBodies andThen composes incorrectly [v3] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8372047: ClassTransform.transformingMethodBodies andThen composes incorrectly Chen Liang
• Integrated: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) Per Minborg
• RFR: 8371978: tools/jar/ReproducibleJar.java fails on XFS SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8371978: tools/jar/ReproducibleJar.java fails on XFS Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8371978: tools/jar/ReproducibleJar.java fails on XFS SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8371978: tools/jar/ReproducibleJar.java fails on XFS SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8371978: tools/jar/ReproducibleJar.java fails on XFS Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8371978: tools/jar/ReproducibleJar.java fails on XFS Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8371978: tools/jar/ReproducibleJar.java fails on XFS Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8371978: tools/jar/ReproducibleJar.java fails on XFS Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8371978: tools/jar/ReproducibleJar.java fails on XFS SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8371978: tools/jar/ReproducibleJar.java fails on XFS SendaoYan
• Integrated: 8353835: Implement JEP 500: Prepare to Make Final Mean Final Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v18] Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v2] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v3] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v2] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v3] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v3] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v3] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v3] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v3] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v3] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v4] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v4] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v4] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v5] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v6] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v7] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v7] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v7] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v8] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v8] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v9] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v9] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v9] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v10] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v11] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v12] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v13] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v14] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v15] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v16] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v16] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v16] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v16] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v16] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v16] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v16] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v16] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v17] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v17] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly Ana Maria Mihalceanu
• RFR: 8372002: VarHandle for receiver's superclass instance fields fails describeConstable Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372002: VarHandle for receiver's superclass instance fields fails describeConstable Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8372002: VarHandle for receiver's superclass instance fields fails describeConstable Jorn Vernee
  • Integrated: 8372002: VarHandle for receiver's superclass instance fields fails describeConstable Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372002: VarHandle for receiver's superclass instance fields fails describeConstable Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372002: VarHandle for receiver's superclass instance fields fails describeConstable Maurizio Cimadamore
• Sharing more of my experience with a custom Gatherer (windowBy) David Alayachew
  • Re: [External] : Sharing more of my experience with a custom Gatherer (windowBy) Viktor Klang
• Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v28] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v28] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v28] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v28] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v28] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v28] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v28] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v28] Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v27] Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8353835: Implement JEP 500: Prepare to Make Final Mean Final [v14] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8353835: Implement JEP 500: Prepare to Make Final Mean Final [v14] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8353835: Implement JEP 500: Prepare to Make Final Mean Final [v14] Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v26] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v26] Maurizio Cimadamore
• Re: RFR: 8348828: Windows dll loading now resolves symlinks [v9] Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8348828: Windows dll loading now resolves symlinks [v9] Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v25] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v25] Raffaello Giulietti
• Could we add headList and tailList methods to j.u.List? David Alayachew
  • Re: Could we add headList and tailList methods to j.u.List? Stuart Marks
  • Re: Could we add headList and tailList methods to j.u.List? David Alayachew
  • Re: [External] : Re: Could we add headList and tailList methods to j.u.List? Stuart Marks
• Re: RFR: 8353835: Implement JEP 500: Prepare to Make Final Mean Final [v13] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8353835: Implement JEP 500: Prepare to Make Final Mean Final [v13] Chen Liang
• RFR: 8371960: Missing null check in AnnotatedType annotation accessor methods Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8371960: Missing null check in AnnotatedType annotation accessor methods Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8371960: Missing null check in AnnotatedType annotation accessor methods Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8371960: Missing null check in AnnotatedType annotation accessor methods Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8371960: Missing null check in AnnotatedType annotation accessor methods Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8371960: Missing null check in AnnotatedType annotation accessor methods Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8371960: Missing null check in AnnotatedType annotation accessor methods Chen Liang
• RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v6] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v2] Chen Liang

• Earlier messages
• Later messages