Interesting but not really true.  A planing hull loses its ability to
plane without the spin and a J 30 is far less affected than a boat such
as C&C 115 with a 200% masthead spin and max LP of 108% of J
 
I do like the idea though.  Single rating is so so much simpler.  Also
takes away the task of having to determine how much of the boat's speed
is due to spinnaker and attempting to adjust.  Base handicaps are far
far easier to set than all of these adjustments.
 
I like it!

________________________________

From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Joel
Aronson
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 9:48 AM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Handicap review


PHRF Chesapeake gives a single rating.  Races are either spin or
non-spin.  I guess they assume that use of a chute benefits everyone
equally. 

Joel
35/3
Annapolis


On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Hoyt, Mike <mike.h...@impgroup.com>
wrote:


        
        Explain how non spin and spin ratings are the same?

________________________________

        From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf
Of Jake Brodersen
        Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 10:00 PM 

        To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
        Subject: Re: Stus-List Handicap review
        


        Tim,

         

        I have a base rating of 123, which I think we can sail to pretty
well in non-spin.  Our boat has the same rating for spin and non-spin.
For comparison, the J30 is rated at 141 here.  

         

        When we sail with the spin fleet we have worked our way into the
middle of the pack, which is about where I expect to be, based on our
experience.  The J30 keeps pace with us going upwind.  We tend to do
better going downwind.  We do have some good local talent that we sail
against, including a J30 national one-design champion.  Most of our
equipment is up to par, although both our .5 oz. and .75 oz. chutes are
over 15 years old.  They are in need of replacement, but still hold a
pretty good shape.  It's just the material is no longer as crisp as it
once was.

         

        What we really like is the kick ass performance of the boat in
the non-spin fleet.  The boat is tough to beat in light air and we have
plenty of that on the Chesapeake.

         

        Jake

         

        Jake Brodersen

        C&C 35 Mk-III

        Midnight Mistress

        Hampton VA

         

         

         

        From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf
Of Tim Goodyear
        Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 8:55 AM
        To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
        Subject: Stus-List Handicap review

         

        Eastern Connecticut Sailing Association is planning to review
the C&C 35-3 PHRF handicap on March 26th.  I've been invited to present
our case with the owner of the only other 35-3 racing in the area.  

         

        35-3 owners (and others), what are your ratings (spinnaker) and
how do they compare, and how are your results, against boats such as
those below that we typically race against (I added a couple of other
C&C's too)?  The ECSA racing area (Long Island Sound) is predominantly
light air.

         

        Thanks,

         

        Tim

         

Soverel 33

89

C&C 99

98

Evelyn 32-2

99

Express 34

99

X372

100

Frers 33

108

J/29 MHOB

114

C&C 38-3

115

C&C 35-3

117

Santana 30-30

120

C&C 36

132

J/30

135

C&C 34

144

C&C 33

149

C&C 30-1

168

         

         


        _______________________________________________
        This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
        http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
        CnC-List@cnc-list.com
        
        




-- 
Joel 
301 541 8551 
_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to