Maybe we need a lawyer?  We can ask Chris.  He's the dean of the faculty of 
Law.  I've never asked him.

Apple cannot sign a binding contract with a 13 YO and I cannot either.  Apple 
however can sell a puter to a 13 YO and they are in contract and she is not.

If she hands it to me and asks me to fix it then I fail to understand how Apple 
has a contract with me.

Next if she D/L's Lion and even if she types in the numbers for my VISA then 
they still do not have a contract with me.  The only law I know which prohibits 
this is DMCA style laws and Canada has not yet enacted them but they are 
trying!  We don't want it.  

Besides which the only reason I can think of for me to D/L lion is so she can 
video edit her school project.  And NEXT!  The only viruses in the puter that I 
can think of came from the school board (from Texas) so she can't cut and paste 
the answer to her geometry questions and lordy on that puter the keyboard quit. 
 I don't have a USB KB.  

We found a virtual KB and this worked and she got 100% in her geometry.  

I think apple will not be able to prevail in a court room.  I'm happy to go 
there.  

I will tell the judge.  I only want my 13 YO to be able to type in the answer 
to her geometry questions.  If I have to hack the machine to get H/W that works 
then so be it!




On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 12:49:24PM -0600, Gustin Johnson wrote:
> EULAs do not work that way.  It does not matter who bought the copy of
> OSX, it can *only* be run on Apple hardware, including virtualized
> copies.
> 
> You may want to check with a lawyer.  I doubt that the 13 buying the
> copy does anything of benefit.  I suspect that legally, all you are
> entitled to do is to return that copy for a refund.  It does not
> magically get you out of all the contractual obligations that you are
> trying to dodge.
> 
> I am not saying that you should not buy an Atom, but I have a real
> hate on for that hardware.  The performance for that power envelope is
> way too low, especially when compared to something Arm based.
> 
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:16 PM,  <t...@terralogic.net> wrote:
> > I'm going to forget an atom.  I have a nice eeePC here and like it and 
> > likely will pick up another since I can get them for like under $150.  I 
> > figure it will make a nice hot spot.  Good for the light weight stuff.
> >
> > But for heavy duty you're right.
> >
> > I can legally get Lion going.  Its quite easy.  Apple sold a snow leopard 
> > to a 13 yo.  She can upgrade.  No contracts are binding with a minor.  I 
> > have no contract.  Not my machine.  I won't sign a contract with a 13 yo.
> >
> > Next when I review what needs to happen?  13 yo is editing video so I guess 
> > maybe I'm going to have to install some serious hardware.  Its not my lion. 
> >  I'm just told there might be a virus in it so they ask me to check it out. 
> >  I'm just the sys admin.  I'm low man on the totem pole.
> >
> > No contracts are binding for like the next 3 years.  right?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:44:12AM -0600, Gustin Johnson wrote:
> >> If you are running virtual machines you pretty need a modern machine
> >> unless you are very patient.  As you are looking at small form factor,
> >> be aware that Intel Atom based solutions do not have the hardware
> >> support that makes VMs practical.  While technically you could get
> >> something working with para-virtualization, you really do not want to
> >> do this.
> >>
> >> You also cannot run OSX Lion in a VM legally unless your host OS is
> >> also Lion running on actual Apple hardware.  There are some other
> >> licencing constraints with OSX.
> >>
> >> For small form factor, look at uATX, something like this perhaps:
> >> http://www.memoryexpress.com/Products/PID-BDL_A83850_F1A75M(ME).aspx
> >>
> >> For even smaller and lower powered you could try something like this:
> >> http://www.memoryexpress.com/Products/PID-MX32502(ME).aspx
> >>
> >> Dual head is provided by most, even the integrated graphics solutions.
> >>  Triple head pretty much requires an ATI (and only models with
> >> Eyefinity in their description).
> >>
> >> The multiple keyboards, mice and monitors has been done.  In fact
> >> there is a local company who does this very thing (Linux based even).
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:29 PM,  <t...@terralogic.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I've looked at www.vfxweb.com and see cheap mobo's for like $26 bux with 
> >> > a cpu.
> >> >
> >> > What would ppl suggest is a decent small form factor way to go which 
> >> > would be able to run a virtual machine and in it run say OSX lion?
> >> >
> >> > I'd likely want to get some other OS's running as well...
> >> >
> >> > Multi head is necessary.
> >> >
> >> > One of the CLUG people asked about setting up a server with six (6) KB's 
> >> > and six (6) mice not including the dead one in my garage and six (6) 
> >> > heads.
> >> >
> >> > I believe we can do this!  Use USB mice and kb's and a couple PCI cards 
> >> > like was in the shuttle-X I brought to the meeting.  Should be easy.  
> >> > Next one of our guys said we can output to a monitor via USB and I'd 
> >> > like to know how to do that!
> >> >
> >> > I'm not sure this makes sense because a thin client should do this as 
> >> > well.  But who knows.  I think the way it should work now is plug the 
> >> > KB, Mouse etc into a flat panel and plug the network in and plug the 
> >> > server into the network.  Of course the network should be fiber.  Fiber 
> >> > runs so fast that why do we need AGP?
> >> >
> >> > We should be showing this at install fests.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > If anyone is interested one of my buddies just put in a 128 core machine.
> >> >
> >> > But they like winders.  Uggh.
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > clug-talk mailing list
> >> > clug-talk@clug.ca
> >> > http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
> >> > Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> >> > **Please remove these lines when replying
> >> >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> clug-talk mailing list
> >> clug-talk@clug.ca
> >> http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
> >> Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> >> **Please remove these lines when replying
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > clug-talk mailing list
> > clug-talk@clug.ca
> > http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
> > Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> > **Please remove these lines when replying
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> clug-talk mailing list
> clug-talk@clug.ca
> http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
> Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> **Please remove these lines when replying

_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
clug-talk@clug.ca
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
**Please remove these lines when replying

Reply via email to