> Good feedback. Thanx. I guess I'm used to reading wikis on github as
> being the official project home pages but I can see your p.o.v.

I'm not taking a position specifically for this thread (only sifted
through it, and I haven't had that particular problem with ccw), but
here is another POV:

Ever since Sourceforge became popular and started the project hosting
thing, I have continually been annoyed when (1) people link to and (2)
google results prefer the sf/github/bitbucket/gcode/whatever page
instead of the manually maintained project page.

The reason is that they are essentially boilerplate that waste my
time, if I am not actively knowledgable about the project already.
Since all projects have the same structure, you essentially know
nothing just by looking at the project summary. You have to dig around
a bit to get a feel for whether it's a live, whether you're in the
right place for documentation and whether the community is
"elsewhere".

A similar effect is what you get with projects that use maven to
generate a boilerplate website. You don't know whether it's actually
filled in, and whether it is worth clicking around to find real
information.

A manually maintained project website, even if completely
non-fashionable, on the other hand gives me an instant feel for the
project. News items on the front page indicate liveness, manually
hand-picked links and decided structure hopefully gives a good crash
course/crash intro as to what it is etc.

Again, just another POV. Take it with a grain of salt. But know that
I'm speaking *as a developer*, just not as a developer *of those
things* that I am trying to find/use/read about.

-- 
/ Peter Schuller

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to