Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> writes: > Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> writes: > >> clojure-lang because there will be a clojure-contrib artifact for the >> same group. > > And this is ... a bad thing? I'm lost. > > -Phil
Good, at least I'm not the only one. Why can't we have both clojure and clojure-contrib as Id's? Daniel E. Renfer --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
