Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> writes: > Seems fine to me. > > One question, though: I see that you want to name the artifact > "clojure-lang" and not just "clojure". > Why not just "clojure" as is the case for the ant build script ? > > I guess this could just confuse people ?
Very good point! That's exactly the kind of feedback I was hoping to get. Pushing a library to Maven Central isn't easy to rewind, if it's possible at all. So I want to make sure beforehand, that the right thing is going to get there. So, here's my explanation, and I hope it is reasonable: I just used the artifactId which is defined in the pom.xml shipped with Clojure since r502 (2007-10-30). Why "clojure-lang" was chosen in favour of just "clojure" confused me too, so I can not give a good explanation. Maybe Rich or the original contributor can? But, since Clojure has shipped this artifactId for 18 months now, it has materialized in many people's repo like that, I guess. In fact, the official 1.0 distribution "clojure-1.0.0.zip" has been shipped with this pom.xml. It seems a matter of fact, that in the maven world Clojure sails under the "clojure-lang" flag since day zero. So I refused to change that quasi-standard, as I don't want to confuse other people, who got used to "clojure-lang" in their maven world. What shall we do then? -Stefan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
