The upload bundle, which is found at
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-2464, promotes Clojure as
"org.clojure:clojure:1.0.0". It hasn't received any atention from the
Upload team yet, but I do hope it gets uploaded within the next
weeks. Maybe voting could speed it up...

dysinger <dysin...@gmail.com> writes:

> I personally have used the -lang qualifier in my own POM work so as to
> have an (unspoken) consensus with Howard's POM work.
>
> However, I would rather clojure proper just be named
> "org.clojure:clojure" in maven/ivy-land myself and I have heard that
> from quite a few others.
>
> On May 10, 1:17 pm, d...@kronkltd.net (Daniel E. Renfer) wrote:
>> Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> writes:
>> > Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> >> clojure-lang because there will be a clojure-contrib artifact for the
>> >> same group.
>>
>> > And this is ... a bad thing? I'm lost.
>>
>> > -Phil
>>
>> Good, at least I'm not the only one.
>>
>> Why can't we have both clojure and clojure-contrib as Id's?
>>
>> Daniel E. Renfer


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to