I personally have used the -lang qualifier in my own POM work so as to have an (unspoken) consensus with Howard's POM work.
However, I would rather clojure proper just be named "org.clojure:clojure" in maven/ivy-land myself and I have heard that from quite a few others. On May 10, 1:17 pm, d...@kronkltd.net (Daniel E. Renfer) wrote: > Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> writes: > > Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> writes: > > >> clojure-lang because there will be a clojure-contrib artifact for the > >> same group. > > > And this is ... a bad thing? I'm lost. > > > -Phil > > Good, at least I'm not the only one. > > Why can't we have both clojure and clojure-contrib as Id's? > > Daniel E. Renfer --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
