2009/5/7 Stefan Hübner <sthueb...@googlemail.com>:
>
> Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> You're right, so from the beginning the ant script creates
>> "clojure..." while the maven script creates "clojure-lang...".
>
> To be precise here, there's no such maven script that creates
> "clojure-lang", neither does Maven do anything during Clojure's build
> process. The pom.xml is created by Ant too.

I know(*) :-), but it's a recent addition. The name "clojure-lang" was
there before ant creating the pom from pom-template, and this
artifactId name was not even closely reviewed during the process.

>
>> Well, I thought that since the official build script is the ant one,
>> the pom.xml should be adapted. In either cases, people will have to
>> change things ...
>>
>> I guess only Rich can make the choice: statu quo, clojure (breaks
>> maven artifact id), clojure-lang (breaks build.xml).
>
> I second your notion. I guess Howard Lewis Ship ought to get involved
> here too, since he maintains the continuous builds and seems to have his
> own build scripts, as long as I'm right. Are they monitoring this
> thread?

I think so.

>
> -Stefan

(*) I did the patch that made pom.xml generated from build.xml

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to