On 9 Mai, 17:08, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> wrote: > clojure-lang because there will be a clojure-contrib artifact for the > same group.
It didn't occur to me yet, that having clojure-contrib in the same group would render "org.clojure:clojure" a bad choice as groupId:artifactId for clojure itself. Does your suggestion follow a particular recommendation or policy? -Stefan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---