On 9 Mai, 17:08, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> wrote:
> clojure-lang because there will be a clojure-contrib artifact for the
> same group.

It didn't occur to me yet, that having clojure-contrib in the same
group would render "org.clojure:clojure" a bad choice as
groupId:artifactId for clojure itself. Does your suggestion follow a
particular recommendation or policy?

-Stefan
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to