Christian Vest Hansen <karmazi...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:47 PM, J. McConnell <jdo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I guess only Rich can make the choice: statu quo, clojure (breaks >>> maven artifact id), clojure-lang (breaks build.xml). >> >> Not that I have a strong stake in this, but I'd vote for going with >> "clojure" and getting it right for 1.0. > > Right. It's easier to change this pom before it goes into the public > repo than after. When people are going to change their pom from some > odd snapshot to 1.0 anyway, then this is probably a good time to sneak > this artifactId change in too, no?
I agree with your position. So, along with uploading the bundle to Central, I'll provide a patch to reflect pom changes in SVN. I'm going to push the bundle forward during the weekend. -Stefan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
