On Nov 3, 7:59 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not advocating the GPL...only a GPL compatible license. Regarding > the benefits to a dual license or reclicense, are you sure there > *aren't* benefits? If it is easy to move to GPL compatibility, then > is it worth worrying about?
Yes, it's worth worrying about. The problem is, you're going to have the danger of fragmenting the Clojure user base. If one part of the community distribute their work under the CPL, while the other part distribute their work under the GPL (or any other CPL-incompatible license), you will not be able to combine code from both parts of the community. You're going to have to rely on everyone dual-licensing their work, which kind of negates all the benefits of having dual- licensed Clojure in the first place. That's the way I see it, anyway. I'm not very sure about all of this. Matthias --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
