On Nov 2, 3:28 pm, "a r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Still, for me a dual CPL/LGPL license would be nicer. This is purely
> for practical reasons - Java itself going GPL, reusing (those few) GPL
> Java libraries or embeddingClojurecompiler in GPL applications (this
> might be OK with CPL, I'm not sure).

Yes! I think a dual license would be great for Clojure too.
That makes 2 of us.

Chris
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to