On Nov 3, 12:36 pm, Matthias Benkard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, it's worth worrying about. The problem is, you're going to have > the danger of fragmenting the Clojure user base. I think Clojure has potential to become *very much* more well known and used. Are we sure we want to risk going down this route when things are an order of magnitude harder? (Think Mozilla.) Chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- Re: Concerned about Clojure's license c... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Concerned about Clojure's licen... Mark H.
- Re: Concerned about Clojure's ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Concerned about Clojure's license c... Christian Vest Hansen
- Re: Concerned about Clojure's licen... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Concerned about Clojure's license choice. a r
- Re: Concerned about Clojure's license choice. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Concerned about Clojure's license choice. mritun
- Re: Concerned about Clojure's license choice. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Concerned about Clojure's license choic... Matthias Benkard
- Re: Concerned about Clojure's license c... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Concerned about Clojure's licen... Rich Hickey
- Re: Concerned about Clojure's ... Matthias Benkard
- Re: Concerned about Clojur... Alec Berryman
- Re: Concerned about Clojur... Matthias Benkard
- Re: Concerned about Clojur... Rich Hickey
- Re: Concerned about Clojur... Matthias Benkard
- Re: Concerned about Clojur... mritun
- Re: Concerned about Clojur... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Concerned about Clojur... Mibu
- Re: Concerned about Clojur... Konrad Hinsen