On Nov 2, 7:12 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 2, 1:56 pm, ".Bill Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > For an earlier discussion of this same topic,
> > seehttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/735aa7f1c...
>
> > Bill
>
> I agree that GPL incompatibility isn't a concern for Clojure *users*.
>
> It would be a practical problem for others however. As 'a r'
> mentioned, it would be problem for someone wanting to share or pull in
> other libraries.
>
> All I'm saying is a lot of FUD could be avoided with MIT or BSD.
>
MIT and BSD are not reciprocal licenses. I want a reciprocal license.
But I don't want the license to apply to, or dictate anything about,
non-derivative work that is combined with mine, as GPL does. I think
doing so is fundamentally wrong.
The fact that GPL is not compatible with that approach is a problem
with GPL, and for users of GPL software.
Rich
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
