On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 5:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello. I am an open source programmer and fan of Clojure! > I wanted to express my concern about your wonderful language project > in the > hopes it may help it succeed even more.
CPL is very liberal and I am pretty happy with this choice. This is not our decision after all - it's the author who decides what people can do with _his_ code. Still, for me a dual CPL/LGPL license would be nicer. This is purely for practical reasons - Java itself going GPL, reusing (those few) GPL Java libraries or embedding Clojure compiler in GPL applications (this might be OK with CPL, I'm not sure). > You may find this article informative.... > > http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/gpl-compatible.html Personally I think this article is rather offensive - GPL incompatibility is (or should be) a problem for people releasing software under GPL, not others. -r. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
