Rich I didn't see any reply to the suggestion to simply negate the choice of law clause. That seems to be the *only* reason this thread (and future threads like it) exist/will exist. I'm just saying it may not be a hill worth dying for so to speak.
Chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---