Rich

I didn't see any reply to the suggestion to simply negate the choice
of law clause.  That seems to be the *only* reason this thread (and
future threads like it) exist/will exist.  I'm just saying it may not
be a hill worth dying for so to speak.

Chris
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to