On Nov 2, 10:52 pm, "Mark H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 2, 10:31 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (There are  examples of projects 'weakening' the GPL in  various ways
> > to suit their needs.)
>
> Just out of curiosity (I don't have an interest in this particular
> issue at the moment so I'm not taking a side in this debate), what
> would be a concrete example in which Clojure would benefit from having
> a different license than it does now?

See the link in my initial post if you haven't already.

Chris
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to