On 16/Jul/20 15:16, [email protected] wrote:
> You should be able to break out the 24x400G ports on 8201 to 96x100G ports
> (plus the 12x100G native),
Probably - not sure.
To be honest, not really interested in what Cisco do anymore. I'll keep
them around because the CSR1000v is the one thing they didn't cock up;
and even if they suddenly stop supporting it for whatever reason, it's
reasonably modern enough that I could still run it for years for BGP-4
route reflection, and not worry about them supporting it.
> Comparing PTX1000 to 8201 is comparing apples and oranges. There's 7Tbps
> difference between these.
> PTX1000 is not 100G optimized (only PTX10K series are).
> I meant the upcoming PTX10k which should be directly comparable with 8201,
> we'll see.
Yes, I knew you were talking about an upcoming new platform. Not really
heavy into that - for us, the PTX1000 meets both of our 10Gbps and
100Gbps core requirements at a fair price, for a very long time to come.
I wish I could say the same about the
very-underutilized-but-still-potent CRS-X's we have, but alas, Cisco
again showing why I can't trust them for the long-haul.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
