On 15/Jul/20 15:08, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
> That’s right. That’s also why I didn’t want to claim Juniper was stupid > with the product, more into direction that such naive approach simply > didn’t work out. Well, we are dumping our CRS-X boxes and the PTX1000 is high up on the list of shoo-ins. > OTOH, that’s still the vision we’re trying to catch up with, right? Have one, > simple and easy to provision/monitor/troubleshoot/traffic engineer/decomission > protocol, that carries all address families, has unified architecture and > universal interoperability “because of that”. > > So, about OpenFlow… ;) Yea, about that :-)... There will come a time when new operators cannot buy IPv4 on an open or black market, so we all need to keep cracking on bringing IPv6 up to scratch. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
