On 17/Jul/20 08:17, Gert Doering wrote:
> But that's actually one of the things that alienates the "not megacarrier" > customers. There's perfectly working routers, they fall out of love, > new features are not added anymore, and you're expected to buy 32x400G > things when all you need are like "16x 10G". I think the MX has shown how this can be done, reasonably well, and still continue to be the pick of the field. The MX104 was the only time I can fault Juniper, but otherwise, what they've done with the MX is nothing short of exemplary. I have no doubt the MX480's I bought in 2014 will still be with us for another 6 years, at least. Which is why I have no problem investing in the MX10003 for dedicated 100Gbps edge customers. Fancy slides and coining catchy terms is no longer a path into our network. Service provider networks are not that complicated, or complex. Get back to your roots, and let's not make it a whole song & dance Mark.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
