> -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Lukasz > Bromirski > Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 6:00 PM > To: Mark Tinka <[email protected]> > Cc: cisco-nsp NSP <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes > > Mark, > > > On 15 Jul 2020, at 15:45, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 15/Jul/20 15:08, Łukasz Bromirski wrote: > > > >> That’s right. That’s also why I didn’t want to claim Juniper was > >> stupid with the product, more into direction that such naive approach > >> simply didn’t work out. > > Well, we are dumping our CRS-X boxes and the PTX1000 is high up on the > > list of shoo-ins. > > That’s interesting. How about Cisco 8000 (feature-rich services) or NCS 55xx > (cheap 10/40/100/200G ifaces)? > Wanna bet which one of the two will be cheaper? (the new upcoming PTX10k1 vs 8201) - also will be interesting to compare flex license options on both.
adam _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
