On 13/Jul/20 21:51, Phil Bedard wrote: > The initial iteration of the PTX couldn't. It was really just meant as an > LSR with relatively low FIB scale, couldn't do Netflow (remember the > external server to do it?), etc. That quickly pivoted to something more > capable. Juniper sort of positioned the initial version as a route > reflector since that was one of the other things it could do due to selective > FIB install. The PTX1000? I somewhat recall the PTX5000 launching first, and then the smaller variants following. But my memory isn't what it used to be. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes Saku Ytti
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes Łukasz Bromirski
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes Łukasz Bromirski
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes Phil Bedard
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes Phil Bedard
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes Łukasz Bromirski
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes Łukasz Bromirski
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes adamv0025
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes Mark Tinka
- Re: [c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes Phil Bedard
