On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, but here we seem to have a partnership that doesn't even require > that of its members. Per R2145, that's not a partnership.
A partnership of me and otherwise uninvolved persons: "The script known as 'xxx' CAN act on behalf of this partnership by announcement. Members of this partnership, especially comex, SHALL ensure that this partnership follows the Rules of Agora to the fullest possible extent. However, comex SHOULD NOT alter the code of 'xxx' except as necessary to fulfill that obligation."
