On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think you're missing the point, which is that the executor of a >> message *cannot be* a collective. Per R2170, it has to be a single >> first-class person, i.e. a single biological organism. > > Um, I thought that was the point I was making but it was comex who wasn't? > I'm royally confused now. -Goethe
Unless I misunderstood you, you said there was "nothing tortuous" about determining the executor of a message composed by committee and sent by Googlebot. If that's true, then who is it? -root
