On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:40 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Yes, but here we seem to have a partnership that doesn't even require >> that of its members. Per R2145, that's not a partnership. > > A partnership of me and otherwise uninvolved persons: "The script > known as 'xxx' CAN act on behalf of this partnership by announcement. > Members of this partnership, especially comex, SHALL ensure that this > partnership follows the Rules of Agora to the fullest possible extent. > However, comex SHOULD NOT alter the code of 'xxx' except as necessary > to fulfill that obligation."
Oh, so then it does have human intervention. -root
