On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Addendum: this is an issue with allowing general inquiry cases rather > than requiring callers to demonstrate specific relevance or standing. > In a real sense, the rules in question would conflict, but the conflict > wouldn't be evident until an instance (e.g. a copy of the page in > question) was actually produced and used.
The point was the usage of 'allow'...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
