On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, comex wrote: >> This rule does not 'allow', as in make reasonably possible restriction of a >> person's rights or privileges. Nevertheless it 'allows' it by legislating >> it. Does Rule 101, which claims to "take precedence over any rule which >> would allow restrictions of a person's rights of privileges" take >> precedence over it? > > Yes of course, Rule R101 would take precedence, provided the rule in > question were of power 3 or less. This is explicit in R1482 and R1030.
Addendum: this is an issue with allowing general inquiry cases rather than requiring callers to demonstrate specific relevance or standing. In a real sense, the rules in question would conflict, but the conflict wouldn't be evident until an instance (e.g. a copy of the page in question) was actually produced and used. -Goethe
