On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Your Vladivostok rule "allows" a dethronement, but R101 forbids the rule > from functioning, so the net effect of the rules is that dethronement > isn't allowed. > > In your case, your contract strictly speaking "allowed" all players to > review the contract, but in practical terms didn't allow reasonable > review time for R101(v), so in practical terms (net effect) players > weren't allowed sufficient time to agree to the contract.
I was not questioning the resulting effect, merely the applicability (or not) of the specific R101 clause "This rule takes precedence over any rule which would allow restrictions of a person's rights or privileges." If the dethronement rule "allows" a dethronement, then why didn't the contracts "allow" all players to join? Both actions are technically possible but (usually!) not feasible.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
