On Oct 18, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Anthony wrote: > > I agree with Bruno's thoughts on the current logo (i.e., #5 and #17 on > the logovote site). It is based on Massimo's thoughtful design concept > -- if you missed his message about it, you can read it here: > http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/msg/dc9b9c33246c985b > > - It is straightforward, broadly appealing, and professional. > - It includes some nice subtle symbolism, particularly the > "overlapping characters to represent tight integration of web2py > components" (which is a real distinctive of web2py). > - It has already received positive public feedback. > - It already has a range of color variations, stickers, and a favicon > that work well (see "web2py artwork" at the bottom of > http://www.web2py.com/examples/default/download). > > There are some promising concepts among the other logo entries, but I > don't think any are as refined or production-ready as this one.
It seems to me that we could use these criteria generally to pare down the candidates. There are several that follow this general approach and don't need a lot of work for application (color schemes can be shared, of course). I do like the concept; I'm not entirely satisfied with the letterforms of the current logo.
