Note that in book cover: http://www.setbit.us/IMG_0108.JPG
WEB2PY is UPPER CASE too! 2010/10/18 Bruno Rocha <rochacbr...@gmail.com> > The Dealine is still 19 for send logos, and 21 for vote. > > That is the round 1, we can have round 2 with the 10 best voted, one week > more for the second round, No uploads just votes. > > For the second round we can change rules and implement some new ideas as > commented here. > > ------ > > BTW: I keep the track of "web2py" in twitter, identica, orkut, facebook, > reddit, googleAlerts, etc.. > 99% of the people, when talking about web2py, are talking about the new > visual stylle. > > Everyone likes that, and that already is the new face of web2py, I think if > we have to change, dont have to change too much ( I like this idea > http://blouweb.com/logovote/default/index?logoid=17 ) It keeps the actual > style and gives us an Icon (that could be improved). I think it is clean, > beauty, soothing enought and enterprise as well. > > There are other important things about this logo (17 or 5), it is nice with > any background, the main idea came from Massimo, it differs web2py from > web.py, It is easy to draw, easy to print, easy to remember. > > The upper case in that is more closer to WEB2PY (because we have DAL, DIV, > FORM..) > > In the beggining it is strange to switch from web2py to WEB2PY, but IMO > UPPER case fits better in for logo, and everyone will differ web.py form > WEB2PY. > > > > > > > > > > 2010/10/17 Anthony <av201...@yahoo.com> > > So, what's happening with the voting method? As already discussed at >> length, the one-vote-per-person method isn't a good idea with so many >> entries (particularly with sets of similar logos). For example, #5 and >> #17 are probably splitting votes. >> >> We really should implement one of the other suggested methods: >> * Approval Voting (vote for as many logos as you want): Probably the >> easiest to implement, and should handle the "clone" problem. (Still >> need the ability to change one's vote(s)). >> * Ratings: Though for this to work, either everyone has to rate every >> logo, or for each voter, each un-rated logo has to be assigned the >> lowest possible value (e.g., 1 star). >> * Ranking: Preferably using the Schulze method for tallying. Probably >> the most complex to implement. >> >> If we're not going to do any of the above, then at the very least, we >> should go back to showing the _number_ of votes for each logo (no need >> to show the names -- they should remain anonymous). That way, at least >> we could see if we are splitting (and possibly wasting) our votes and >> then shift our support to a logo we like that has a chance of winning. >> >> If we stick with the current voting method, with 50+ logos, we could >> easily end up with a "winner" that gets the support of only a small >> percentage of the voters. >> >> Also, is the voting deadline still Oct. 19? >> >> Thanks. >> >> Anthony >> >> On Oct 13, 5:17 pm, Bruno Rocha <rochacbr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Martin Mulone made the logovote application. >> > >> > I am hosting at my server >> > >> > You can post logo ideas, and vote for you prefered logo. >> > >> > Better if you made an transparent canvas .gif or .png maximum 250x70 >> > >> > Maximum of 10 uploads per user, Just one vote per user. >> > >> > Take a look:http://blouweb.com/logovote/ >> > > > > -- > > http://rochacbruno.com.br > -- http://rochacbruno.com.br
