The Dealine is still 19 for send logos, and 21 for vote. That is the round 1, we can have round 2 with the 10 best voted, one week more for the second round, No uploads just votes.
For the second round we can change rules and implement some new ideas as commented here. ------ BTW: I keep the track of "web2py" in twitter, identica, orkut, facebook, reddit, googleAlerts, etc.. 99% of the people, when talking about web2py, are talking about the new visual stylle. Everyone likes that, and that already is the new face of web2py, I think if we have to change, dont have to change too much ( I like this idea http://blouweb.com/logovote/default/index?logoid=17 ) It keeps the actual style and gives us an Icon (that could be improved). I think it is clean, beauty, soothing enought and enterprise as well. There are other important things about this logo (17 or 5), it is nice with any background, the main idea came from Massimo, it differs web2py from web.py, It is easy to draw, easy to print, easy to remember. The upper case in that is more closer to WEB2PY (because we have DAL, DIV, FORM..) In the beggining it is strange to switch from web2py to WEB2PY, but IMO UPPER case fits better in for logo, and everyone will differ web.py form WEB2PY. 2010/10/17 Anthony <av201...@yahoo.com> > So, what's happening with the voting method? As already discussed at > length, the one-vote-per-person method isn't a good idea with so many > entries (particularly with sets of similar logos). For example, #5 and > #17 are probably splitting votes. > > We really should implement one of the other suggested methods: > * Approval Voting (vote for as many logos as you want): Probably the > easiest to implement, and should handle the "clone" problem. (Still > need the ability to change one's vote(s)). > * Ratings: Though for this to work, either everyone has to rate every > logo, or for each voter, each un-rated logo has to be assigned the > lowest possible value (e.g., 1 star). > * Ranking: Preferably using the Schulze method for tallying. Probably > the most complex to implement. > > If we're not going to do any of the above, then at the very least, we > should go back to showing the _number_ of votes for each logo (no need > to show the names -- they should remain anonymous). That way, at least > we could see if we are splitting (and possibly wasting) our votes and > then shift our support to a logo we like that has a chance of winning. > > If we stick with the current voting method, with 50+ logos, we could > easily end up with a "winner" that gets the support of only a small > percentage of the voters. > > Also, is the voting deadline still Oct. 19? > > Thanks. > > Anthony > > On Oct 13, 5:17 pm, Bruno Rocha <rochacbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Martin Mulone made the logovote application. > > > > I am hosting at my server > > > > You can post logo ideas, and vote for you prefered logo. > > > > Better if you made an transparent canvas .gif or .png maximum 250x70 > > > > Maximum of 10 uploads per user, Just one vote per user. > > > > Take a look:http://blouweb.com/logovote/ > -- http://rochacbruno.com.br
