I think logo really should be lower case. Anyway, my link logo won't work as well upper case, I think.
On Oct 17, 11:01 pm, Bruno Rocha <rochacbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Perfect! it is UPPER case in logo, but lower case in title. Just what we > have today in the main website! > > 2010/10/18 Bruno Rocha <rochacbr...@gmail.com> > > > > > Note that in book cover:http://www.setbit.us/IMG_0108.JPG > > > WEB2PY is UPPER CASE too! > > > 2010/10/18 Bruno Rocha <rochacbr...@gmail.com> > > > The Dealine is still 19 for send logos, and 21 for vote. > > >> That is the round 1, we can have round 2 with the 10 best voted, one week > >> more for the second round, No uploads just votes. > > >> For the second round we can change rules and implement some new ideas as > >> commented here. > > >> ------ > > >> BTW: I keep the track of "web2py" in twitter, identica, orkut, facebook, > >> reddit, googleAlerts, etc.. > >> 99% of the people, when talking about web2py, are talking about the new > >> visual stylle. > > >> Everyone likes that, and that already is the new face of web2py, I think > >> if we have to change, dont have to change too much ( I like this idea > >>http://blouweb.com/logovote/default/index?logoid=17) It keeps the > >> actual style and gives us an Icon (that could be improved). I think it is > >> clean, beauty, soothing enought and enterprise as well. > > >> There are other important things about this logo (17 or 5), it is nice > >> with any background, the main idea came from Massimo, it differs web2py > >> from > >> web.py, It is easy to draw, easy to print, easy to remember. > > >> The upper case in that is more closer to WEB2PY (because we have DAL, DIV, > >> FORM..) > > >> In the beggining it is strange to switch from web2py to WEB2PY, but IMO > >> UPPER case fits better in for logo, and everyone will differ web.py form > >> WEB2PY. > > >> 2010/10/17 Anthony <av201...@yahoo.com> > > >> So, what's happening with the voting method? As already discussed at > >>> length, the one-vote-per-person method isn't a good idea with so many > >>> entries (particularly with sets of similar logos). For example, #5 and > >>> #17 are probably splitting votes. > > >>> We really should implement one of the other suggested methods: > >>> * Approval Voting (vote for as many logos as you want): Probably the > >>> easiest to implement, and should handle the "clone" problem. (Still > >>> need the ability to change one's vote(s)). > >>> * Ratings: Though for this to work, either everyone has to rate every > >>> logo, or for each voter, each un-rated logo has to be assigned the > >>> lowest possible value (e.g., 1 star). > >>> * Ranking: Preferably using the Schulze method for tallying. Probably > >>> the most complex to implement. > > >>> If we're not going to do any of the above, then at the very least, we > >>> should go back to showing the _number_ of votes for each logo (no need > >>> to show the names -- they should remain anonymous). That way, at least > >>> we could see if we are splitting (and possibly wasting) our votes and > >>> then shift our support to a logo we like that has a chance of winning. > > >>> If we stick with the current voting method, with 50+ logos, we could > >>> easily end up with a "winner" that gets the support of only a small > >>> percentage of the voters. > > >>> Also, is the voting deadline still Oct. 19? > > >>> Thanks. > > >>> Anthony > > >>> On Oct 13, 5:17 pm, Bruno Rocha <rochacbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > Martin Mulone made the logovote application. > > >>> > I am hosting at my server > > >>> > You can post logo ideas, and vote for you prefered logo. > > >>> > Better if you made an transparent canvas .gif or .png maximum 250x70 > > >>> > Maximum of 10 uploads per user, Just one vote per user. > > >>> > Take a look:http://blouweb.com/logovote/ > > >> -- > > >>http://rochacbruno.com.br > > > -- > > >http://rochacbruno.com.br > > -- > > http://rochacbruno.com.br
