Perfect! it is UPPER case in logo, but lower case in title. Just what we have today in the main website!
2010/10/18 Bruno Rocha <rochacbr...@gmail.com> > Note that in book cover: http://www.setbit.us/IMG_0108.JPG > > WEB2PY is UPPER CASE too! > > 2010/10/18 Bruno Rocha <rochacbr...@gmail.com> > > The Dealine is still 19 for send logos, and 21 for vote. >> >> That is the round 1, we can have round 2 with the 10 best voted, one week >> more for the second round, No uploads just votes. >> >> For the second round we can change rules and implement some new ideas as >> commented here. >> >> ------ >> >> BTW: I keep the track of "web2py" in twitter, identica, orkut, facebook, >> reddit, googleAlerts, etc.. >> 99% of the people, when talking about web2py, are talking about the new >> visual stylle. >> >> Everyone likes that, and that already is the new face of web2py, I think >> if we have to change, dont have to change too much ( I like this idea >> http://blouweb.com/logovote/default/index?logoid=17 ) It keeps the >> actual style and gives us an Icon (that could be improved). I think it is >> clean, beauty, soothing enought and enterprise as well. >> >> There are other important things about this logo (17 or 5), it is nice >> with any background, the main idea came from Massimo, it differs web2py from >> web.py, It is easy to draw, easy to print, easy to remember. >> >> The upper case in that is more closer to WEB2PY (because we have DAL, DIV, >> FORM..) >> >> In the beggining it is strange to switch from web2py to WEB2PY, but IMO >> UPPER case fits better in for logo, and everyone will differ web.py form >> WEB2PY. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2010/10/17 Anthony <av201...@yahoo.com> >> >> So, what's happening with the voting method? As already discussed at >>> length, the one-vote-per-person method isn't a good idea with so many >>> entries (particularly with sets of similar logos). For example, #5 and >>> #17 are probably splitting votes. >>> >>> We really should implement one of the other suggested methods: >>> * Approval Voting (vote for as many logos as you want): Probably the >>> easiest to implement, and should handle the "clone" problem. (Still >>> need the ability to change one's vote(s)). >>> * Ratings: Though for this to work, either everyone has to rate every >>> logo, or for each voter, each un-rated logo has to be assigned the >>> lowest possible value (e.g., 1 star). >>> * Ranking: Preferably using the Schulze method for tallying. Probably >>> the most complex to implement. >>> >>> If we're not going to do any of the above, then at the very least, we >>> should go back to showing the _number_ of votes for each logo (no need >>> to show the names -- they should remain anonymous). That way, at least >>> we could see if we are splitting (and possibly wasting) our votes and >>> then shift our support to a logo we like that has a chance of winning. >>> >>> If we stick with the current voting method, with 50+ logos, we could >>> easily end up with a "winner" that gets the support of only a small >>> percentage of the voters. >>> >>> Also, is the voting deadline still Oct. 19? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Anthony >>> >>> On Oct 13, 5:17 pm, Bruno Rocha <rochacbr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Martin Mulone made the logovote application. >>> > >>> > I am hosting at my server >>> > >>> > You can post logo ideas, and vote for you prefered logo. >>> > >>> > Better if you made an transparent canvas .gif or .png maximum 250x70 >>> > >>> > Maximum of 10 uploads per user, Just one vote per user. >>> > >>> > Take a look:http://blouweb.com/logovote/ >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> http://rochacbruno.com.br >> > > > > -- > > http://rochacbruno.com.br > -- http://rochacbruno.com.br
