A new variation to favicon + current design: http://blouweb.com/logovote/default/index?logoid=124
On Oct 18, 11:16 am, Anthony <av201...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I agree with Bruno's thoughts on the current logo (i.e., #5 and #17 on > the logovote site). It is based on Massimo's thoughtful design concept > -- if you missed his message about it, you can read it > here:http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/msg/dc9b9c33246c985b > > - It is straightforward, broadly appealing, and professional. > - It includes some nice subtle symbolism, particularly the > "overlapping characters to represent tight integration of web2py > components" (which is a real distinctive of web2py). > - It has already received positive public feedback. > - It already has a range of color variations, stickers, and a favicon > that work well (see "web2py artwork" at the bottom > ofhttp://www.web2py.com/examples/default/download). > > There are some promising concepts among the other logo entries, but I > don't think any are as refined or production-ready as this one. > > Anthony > > On Oct 17, 10:45 pm, Bruno Rocha <rochacbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > The Dealine is still 19 for send logos, and 21 for vote. > > > That is the round 1, we can have round 2 with the 10 best voted, one week > > more for the second round, No uploads just votes. > > > For the second round we can change rules and implement some new ideas as > > commented here. > > > ------ > > > BTW: I keep the track of "web2py" in twitter, identica, orkut, facebook, > > reddit, googleAlerts, etc.. > > 99% of the people, when talking about web2py, are talking about the new > > visual stylle. > > > Everyone likes that, and that already is the new face of web2py, I think if > > we have to change, dont have to change too much ( I like this > > ideahttp://blouweb.com/logovote/default/index?logoid=17) It keeps the > > actual > > style and gives us an Icon (that could be improved). I think it is clean, > > beauty, soothing enought and enterprise as well. > > > There are other important things about this logo (17 or 5), it is nice with > > any background, the main idea came from Massimo, it differs web2py from > > web.py, It is easy to draw, easy to print, easy to remember. > > > The upper case in that is more closer to WEB2PY (because we have DAL, DIV, > > FORM..) > > > In the beggining it is strange to switch from web2py to WEB2PY, but IMO > > UPPER case fits better in for logo, and everyone will differ web.py form > > WEB2PY. > > > 2010/10/17 Anthony <av201...@yahoo.com> > > > > So, what's happening with the voting method? As already discussed at > > > length, the one-vote-per-person method isn't a good idea with so many > > > entries (particularly with sets of similar logos). For example, #5 and > > > #17 are probably splitting votes. > > > > We really should implement one of the other suggested methods: > > > * Approval Voting (vote for as many logos as you want): Probably the > > > easiest to implement, and should handle the "clone" problem. (Still > > > need the ability to change one's vote(s)). > > > * Ratings: Though for this to work, either everyone has to rate every > > > logo, or for each voter, each un-rated logo has to be assigned the > > > lowest possible value (e.g., 1 star). > > > * Ranking: Preferably using the Schulze method for tallying. Probably > > > the most complex to implement. > > > > If we're not going to do any of the above, then at the very least, we > > > should go back to showing the _number_ of votes for each logo (no need > > > to show the names -- they should remain anonymous). That way, at least > > > we could see if we are splitting (and possibly wasting) our votes and > > > then shift our support to a logo we like that has a chance of winning. > > > > If we stick with the current voting method, with 50+ logos, we could > > > easily end up with a "winner" that gets the support of only a small > > > percentage of the voters. > > > > Also, is the voting deadline still Oct. 19? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Anthony > > > > On Oct 13, 5:17 pm, Bruno Rocha <rochacbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Martin Mulone made the logovote application. > > > > > I am hosting at my server > > > > > You can post logo ideas, and vote for you prefered logo. > > > > > Better if you made an transparent canvas .gif or .png maximum 250x70 > > > > > Maximum of 10 uploads per user, Just one vote per user. > > > > > Take a look:http://blouweb.com/logovote/ > > > -- > > >http://rochacbruno.com.br-Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -
