With approval voting, I'm not sure we really need the second phase of voting, but I suppose that would be fine. I would use approval voting in both phases.
On Oct 17, 8:45 pm, "Martin.Mulone" <mulone.mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think "Approval Voting" is better way than the current, easy to > implement and I ready to do so what the others think?. Random is very > annoying, and i dont believe that change anything in matter of votes. > How about that after deadline for sending ideas (1 day after or two) > have the 5 or 6 most votes logos, delete (hide) the others and reset > votes. > > On 17 oct, 21:08, Anthony <av201...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Ordering by most recent comments would be great too. > > > On Oct 17, 6:29 pm, Anthony <av201...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Also, although ordering the logos randomly by default is a good idea, > > > it would also be helpful to allow the user to select ordering by most > > > recently submitted (and possibly by number of votes). At this point, I > > > have seen all the logos submitted so far, so when I check the site, I > > > just want to see the most recent submissions, which is difficult with > > > the logos ordered randomly (the random ordering is also a hassle when > > > returning from viewing/submitting comments because it re-randomizes > > > the list on each re-load). > > > > Thanks. > > > > Anthony > > > > On Oct 17, 5:40 pm, Anthony <av201...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > So, what's happening with the voting method? As already discussed at > > > > length, the one-vote-per-person method isn't a good idea with so many > > > > entries (particularly with sets of similar logos). For example, #5 and > > > > #17 are probably splitting votes. > > > > > We really should implement one of the other suggested methods: > > > > * Approval Voting (vote for as many logos as you want): Probably the > > > > easiest to implement, and should handle the "clone" problem. (Still > > > > need the ability to change one's vote(s)). > > > > * Ratings: Though for this to work, either everyone has to rate every > > > > logo, or for each voter, each un-rated logo has to be assigned the > > > > lowest possible value (e.g., 1 star). > > > > * Ranking: Preferably using the Schulze method for tallying. Probably > > > > the most complex to implement. > > > > > If we're not going to do any of the above, then at the very least, we > > > > should go back to showing the _number_ of votes for each logo (no need > > > > to show the names -- they should remain anonymous). That way, at least > > > > we could see if we are splitting (and possibly wasting) our votes and > > > > then shift our support to a logo we like that has a chance of winning. > > > > > If we stick with the current voting method, with 50+ logos, we could > > > > easily end up with a "winner" that gets the support of only a small > > > > percentage of the voters. > > > > > Also, is the voting deadline still Oct. 19? > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > Anthony > > > > > On Oct 13, 5:17 pm, Bruno Rocha <rochacbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Martin Mulone made the logovote application. > > > > > > I am hosting at my server > > > > > > You can post logo ideas, and vote for you prefered logo. > > > > > > Better if you made an transparent canvas .gif or .png maximum 250x70 > > > > > > Maximum of 10 uploads per user, Just one vote per user. > > > > > > Take a look:http://blouweb.com/logovote/-Hidequotedtext - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
