Chris Santerre a écrit : > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: mouss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 1:28 PM >>To: jdow >>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org >>Subject: Re: Over-scoring of SURBL lists... >> > > SNIP > >>also, when someone's filter misses spam, the common answer is 'use >>SARE". but it seems to me that SARE is not managed (they don't seem to >>care about false positive reports). worst, all SA docs suggest using >>external rules, without warning about the dangers.... >> > > > What?! > > We have a forum.
"Forums are offline.. Please use the mailling list. http://lists.maddoc.net/mailman/listinfo/sare-users"; I indeed could subscribe there. sorry. my fault. How many times have you posted FPs in it? Its more common > to post them here on this list. We have always discussed SARE issues here as > long as it didn't become too much traffic. It never has, and has completely > disapaited over time. Thats not SAREs fault! ok. sorry. will use the forum | sare-users.
