Hi!
I have two things related to this:
1- if the lists are indeed separate (ie: different sources, etc,)
then having multiple rules makes sense.
They're about 95% separate.. They're all separately maintained, and have
a lot of different approaches to making sure a listing is valid.
I don't think there's any direct cross-feeds where one spamtrap operator
feeds their trap data multiple lists.
However, there's some potential for duplicate input because of the
end-user-reporting.
The end user reporting is really low, eg 1-5 a day, i hope we list more
then that. Also, they are manually checked. Yes there is a way for users
to report but for SURBL its really non existant. If we would take away the
complete form people would not even notice (in list performance). SC is
another story naturally.
theURIs. He then pulls out a few URIs, and manualy reports them to
URIBL. He then goes to rulesemporium.com and reports it to WS. If he's
got an outblaze account, he could also report to OB.
Its not an aut-add-form. Its a pass to human checking form.
In the past FPs were rare and always confined to one list. In the past
6 months I've seen a dramatic increase in FPs from WS, OB and BLACK.
Then we need to rescore THOSE lists in my eyes and move punisch other
lists that are doing a damn great job. <wink wink> ;)
Bye,
Raymond.
