users  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Alex
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Kevin A. McGrail
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Alex
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Alex
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Alex
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Alex
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Alex
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Alex
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Henrik K
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Alex
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Alex
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Bill Cole
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Alex
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Bill Cole
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Alex
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Alex
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Benny Pedersen
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Kevin A. McGrail
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Benny Pedersen
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Bill Cole
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Benny Pedersen
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Alex
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Kevin A. McGrail
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Alex
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Alex
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Alex
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Bill Cole
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Alex
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Benny Pedersen
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? giovanni
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Benny Pedersen
  • Re: DMARC fails for valid record? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• Spamhaus spurious positives - how does SpamAssassin check Spamhaus? Paul Pace
  • Re: Spamhaus spurious positives - how does SpamAssassin check Spamhaus? Benny Pedersen
  • Re: Spamhaus spurious positives - how does SpamAssassin check Spamhaus? Paul Pace
  • Re: Spamhaus spurious positives - how does SpamAssassin check Spamhaus? Matija Nalis
  • Re: Spamhaus spurious positives - how does SpamAssassin check Spamhaus? Paul Pace
  • Re: Spamhaus spurious positives - how does SpamAssassin check Spamhaus? Pedro David Marco
  • Re: Spamhaus spurious positives - how does SpamAssassin check Spamhaus? Bill Cole
• Intuit servers sending paypal phishes Dave Wreski
  • Re: Intuit servers sending paypal phishes Kevin A. McGrail
  • Re: Intuit servers sending paypal phishes Shawn Iverson
• Rule syntax in local.cf? Thomas Cameron
  • Re: Rule syntax in local.cf? Bill Cole
  • Re: Rule syntax in local.cf? Thomas Cameron
• IPv6 issue Ted Mittelstaedt
  • Re: IPv6 issue Greg Troxel
  • Re: IPv6 issue Ted Mittelstaedt
  • Re: IPv6 issue Grant Taylor
  • Re: IPv6 issue Greg Troxel
  • Re: IPv6 issue Ted Mittelstaedt
  • Re: IPv6 issue Benny Pedersen
  • Re: IPv6 issue Grant Taylor
  • Re: IPv6 issue Benny Pedersen
  • Re: IPv6 issue Jeremy Ardley
• Spamassassin with Galera as SQL-Backend? Niels Kobschätzki
  • Re: Spamassassin with Galera as SQL-Backend? Henrik K
  • Re: Spamassassin with Galera as SQL-Backend? Benny Pedersen
  • Re: Spamassassin with Galera as SQL-Backend? Niels Kobschätzki
  • Re: Spamassassin with Galera as SQL-Backend? Benny Pedersen
  • Re: Spamassassin with Galera as SQL-Backend? giovanni
  • Re: Spamassassin with Galera as SQL-Backend? Henrik K
  • Re: Spamassassin with Galera as SQL-Backend? deano-spamassassin
  • Re: Spamassassin with Galera as SQL-Backend? Darrell Budic
• SPF skipped for whitelisted relay domain Alex
  • Re: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay domain Kevin A. McGrail
  • Re: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay domain Benny Pedersen
  • Re: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay domain Kevin A. McGrail
  • Re: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay domain Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay domain Alex
  • Re: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay domain Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay domain Alex
  • Re: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay domain Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay domain Alex
• Why shouldn't I set the score for SPAM_99 and SPAM_999 higher? Thomas Cameron
  • Re: Why shouldn't I set the score for SPAM_99 and SPAM_999 higher? Thomas Cameron
  • Re: Why shouldn't I set the score for SPAM_99 and SPAM_999 higher? Matija Nalis
  • Re: Why shouldn't I set the score for SPAM_99 and SPAM_999 higher? Thomas Cameron
  • Re: Why shouldn't I set the score for SPAM_99 and SPAM_999 higher? Dave Wreski
  • Re: Why shouldn't I set the score for SPAM_99 and SPAM_999 higher? Thomas Cameron
  • Re: Why shouldn't I set the score for SPAM_99 and SPAM_999 higher? Dave Wreski
  • Re: Why shouldn't I set the score for SPAM_99 and SPAM_999 higher? Thomas Cameron
• REMINDER - Travel Assistance available for ApacheCon NA New Orleans 2022 Gavin McDonald
• Re: Another evil number Kevin A. McGrail
  • Re: Another evil number Loren Wilton
  • Re: Another evil number Kevin A. McGrail
  • Re: Another evil number @lbutlr
  • Re: Another evil number Kevin A. McGrail
• Untrustworthy TLDs and KAM Alex
  • Re: Untrustworthy TLDs and KAM Kevin A. McGrail
  • Re: Untrustworthy TLDs and KAM Noel Butler
  • Re: Untrustworthy TLDs and KAM Kevin A. McGrail
  • Re: Untrustworthy TLDs and KAM Noel Butler
  • Re: Untrustworthy TLDs and KAM Alex
  • Re: Untrustworthy TLDs and KAM Kevin A. McGrail
  • Re: Untrustworthy TLDs and KAM Benny Pedersen
  • Re: Untrustworthy TLDs and KAM Henrik K
  • Re: Untrustworthy TLDs and KAM Kevin A. McGrail
• Re: Microsoft to block Office VBA macros by default Kevin A. McGrail
• compat_welcomelist_blocklist errors in latest update asparks
  • Re: compat_welcomelist_blocklist errors in latest update Henrik K
  • Re: compat_welcomelist_blocklist errors in latest update asparks
• update-rules script: Error with latest LWP:::UserAgent on FreeBSD Larry Rosenman
  • Re: update-rules script: Error with latest LWP:::UserAgent on FreeBSD Henrik K
• [no subject] Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: your mail Henrik K
  • Re: your mail Henrik K
  • Re: your mail Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: your mail Henrik K
  • Re: your mail Henrik K
  • Re: your mail Kris Deugau
  • [no subject] Pedro David Marco
  • Re: Kevin A. McGrail
• Running spamassassin only with specific rules Michael Grant
  • Re: Running spamassassin only with specific rules Martin Gregorie
  • Re: Running spamassassin only with specific rules Bill Cole
• How to deal with bounce messages Alex
  • Re: How to deal with bounce messages Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: How to deal with bounce messages Alex
  • Re: How to deal with bounce messages Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: How to deal with bounce messages David Bürgin
  • Re: How to deal with bounce messages Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: How to deal with bounce messages David Bürgin
  • Re: How to deal with bounce messages Alex
  • Re: How to deal with bounce messages Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: How to deal with bounce messages Henrik K
  • Re: How to deal with bounce messages Giovanni Bechis
  • Re: How to deal with bounce messages Henrik K
  • Re: How to deal with bounce messages Henrik K
• sa-update note Jared Hall
• Linting of local.cf J Doe
  • Re: Linting of local.cf Benny Pedersen
  • Re: Linting of local.cf J Doe
  • Re: Linting of local.cf Benny Pedersen
  • Re: Linting of local.cf Loren Wilton
  • Re: Linting of local.cf J Doe
  • Re: Linting of local.cf Benny Pedersen
  • RE: Linting of local.cf Steven Manross
  • Re: Linting of local.cf J Doe
  • Re: Linting of local.cf Benny Pedersen
  • Re: Linting of local.cf Martin Gregorie
  • Re: Linting of local.cf Henrik K
• Re: Sequential spamassassin scans get different results Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: Sequential spamassassin scans get different results Jeremy Ardley
  • Re: Sequential spamassassin scans get different results Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: Sequential spamassassin scans get different results Bill Cole
  • Re: Sequential spamassassin scans get different results Bill Cole
  • Re: Sequential spamassassin scans get different results Jeremy Ardley
• T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE Larry Nedry
  • Re: T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE Loren Wilton
  • Re: T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE Bill Cole
• sub-test syntax Niamh Holding
  • Re: sub-test syntax Matija Nalis
  • Re: sub-test syntax Niamh Holding
  • Re: sub-test syntax Matija Nalis
  • Re: sub-test syntax Martin Gregorie
  • Re: sub-test syntax Matija Nalis
  • Re: sub-test syntax Martin Gregorie
  • Re: sub-test syntax Niamh Holding
  • Re: sub-test syntax Matija Nalis
• spam declared mail - contentless - lost? mauric
  • Re: spam declared mail - contentless - lost? Martin Gregorie
• bug in 3.4.6 Benny Pedersen
  • Re: bug in 3.4.6 Bill Cole
  • Re: bug in 3.4.6 Ralph Seichter
  • Re: bug in 3.4.6 Benny Pedersen
  • Re: bug in 3.4.6 Bill Cole
  • Re: bug in 3.4.6 Benny Pedersen
  • Re: bug in 3.4.6 Bill Cole
  • Re: bug in 3.4.6 Bill Cole
• What does this header mean?... X-Spam_score_int: -38 Don Saklad
  • Re: What does this header mean?... X-Spam_score_int: -38 David Bürgin
  • Re: What does this header mean?... X-Spam_score_int: -38 Bill Cole
  • Re: What does this header mean?... X-Spam_score_int: -38 Larry Rosenman
• Call for Presentations now open, ApacheCon North America 2022 Rich Bowen
• Re: using spamassassin to classify spam Benny Pedersen
  • Re: using spamassassin to classify spam Henrik K
  • Re: using spamassassin to classify spam Benny Pedersen
  • Re: using spamassassin to classify spam Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: using spamassassin to classify spam Michael Grant
  • Re: using spamassassin to classify spam Martin Gregorie

• Later messages