On Sunday, February 19, 2006, 8:07:30 PM, Theo Dinter wrote: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 07:19:28PM -0800, Jeff Chan wrote: >> > 37.539 42.4763 7.2626 0.854 0.38 0.00 URIBL_WS_SURBL >> >> Should the ham hit rate of WS really be 7%? That seems rather >> high. May we ask you to please double check that result?
> I was waiting for someone to ask me about that. Here's my net results > from Saturday's run: > 37.737 42.2554 7.2824 0.853 0.56 0.00 URIBL_WS_SURBL > That is a valid percentage. 921 hits in 12647 total results = 7.2824%. > I verified that all of the 921 hits are in fact listed in the header. That seems an unusual result. Can you see if there's maybe one FP that's hitting a lot of newsletters or ads? Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
