On Thursday, February 16, 2006, 9:07:48 PM, Theo Dinter wrote: > I was going to tell you that the stats were real-time, but that's only > true for the SURBL rules. URIBL hits aren't being reused during the > weekly runs since 3.1 doesn't have those rules.
> So I did a small tweek and generated my own live results for mails from > the past 2 weeks: > MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME > 0 25247 4117 0.860 0.00 0.00 (all messages) > 0.00000 85.9794 14.0206 0.860 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %) > 35.418 41.1930 0.0000 1.000 0.90 0.00 URIBL_JP_SURBL > 34.665 40.3177 0.0000 1.000 0.88 0.00 URIBL_SC_SURBL > 26.069 30.3204 0.0000 1.000 0.80 0.00 URIBL_AB_SURBL > 28.024 32.5464 0.2915 0.991 0.61 0.00 URIBL_OB_SURBL > 48.113 55.7492 1.2873 0.977 0.55 0.00 URIBL_BLACK > 0.293 0.3406 0.0000 1.000 0.47 0.00 URIBL_PH_SURBL > 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.42 0.00 URIBL_RED > 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.42 0.01 T_URIBL_XS_SURBL > 37.539 42.4763 7.2626 0.854 0.38 0.00 URIBL_WS_SURBL > 0.548 0.3446 1.7974 0.161 0.03 0.00 URIBL_GREY Should the ham hit rate of WS really be 7%? That seems rather high. May we ask you to please double check that result? Cheers, Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
