Missed the earlier discussion. I also always regarded cycleway=opposite, opposite_track, opposite_lane, opposite_share_busway etc. as the old deprecated method and oneway:bicycle=no + normal cycleway tag as the one that superceded it.
Same with cycleway:right=dual_lane/dual_track being superceded by or at least synonymous to cycleway:right=lane+cyleway:right:oneway=no. Tobias Am 15. März 2019 01:35:51 MEZ schrieb Hubert87 <sg.fo...@gmx.de>: >I also regard > >"cycleway:left=lane" >"cycleway:left:oneway=-1" > >as the currently preferred method and have been mapping/tagging like >this for a while now. > >Just my two cents > >Hubert87 > > >Am 15.03.2019 um 00:12 schrieb althio: >> Discussed: maybe there >> >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-May/036164.html >> Decided : I don't know >> >>> Cmuelle introduces rather complex combinations of tags such as >cycleway:left=lane + cycleway:left:oneway=-1, that should in his view >be used instead of cycleway:left=opposite_lane. Does anyone on this >list know whether this change has been discussed anywhere, and where >and when it has been decided that cycleway=opposite_lane is a "legacy >tag" ? If so please point me at some references. >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >_______________________________________________ >Tagging mailing list >Tagging@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
