+1 for your rationale by not being blinded by sheer numbers. (if we are to go by the numbers there, we are stuck with the oldest and most established tags ever, regardless of their shortcomings)
-1 for your suspicion. If you cannot live with a wiki being changed, then use paper. Wikis were meant to be edited. They are here, to not have to use an eraser or whiteout if an example is to be added or a mistake is to be fixed. OT: The people stuck in their habit of continuously commenting on things, longing to pertain the status quo regardless of how ridiculous the state it is in, don't they look suspicious too in your eyes? Regards, cmuelle8 > On 15/03/2019 08:50, althio wrote: > > Whatever the preferred tagging method, both are used and both should be > documented in the wiki. > At least for the sake of data users and definition of used tags. > > The edit of the wiki looks suspicious. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
