Am Fr., 15. März 2019 um 11:15 Uhr schrieb Andrew Davidson < thesw...@gmail.com>:
> On 15/3/19 11:35 am, Hubert87 wrote: > > > > > "cycleway:left:oneway=-1" > > > > as the currently preferred method and have been mapping/tagging like > > this for a while now. > > What makes you think that? > > cycleway:left:oneway=-1 => 979 > cycleway:right:oneway=-1 => 19 > > oneway:bicycle=no => 70400 > > and looking at http://taghistory.raifer.tech/ oneway:bicycle was being > added at a rate of 120:1 to cycleway:left/right:oneway in the first half > of 2018. these tags are stating different things though: oneway:bicycle=no => 70400 is about oneway roads where the oneway restriction does not apply to cyclists. cycleway:left:oneway=-1 on the other hand is describing a dedicated cycling infrastructure with a oneway restriction (opposite to the osm way direction). Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
